theme

prettylittlewinchestersinatardis:

tambokazooie:

theenigmaofriversong:

tambokazooie:

theenigmaofriversong:

thefrozenhurricane:

doogiestinson:

thefrozenhurricane:

theenigmaofriversong:

alextimmons:

poco-loki:

thecorruptedquietone:

prongsmydeer:

Plot twist: The next companion is a normal girl/boy who only dies once in their lifetime and has no remarkable back story but he thinks they’re wonderful because they are human and the Doctor needs reminding that you don’t need to be a mystery to be remarkable. 

#and the doctor never has to kiss them or sexualize them at all #in fact they are not even attracted to the doctor

so basically we want Donna back

image

So basically we want someone who penultimate moment proves that she was destined to be in the role she is in, completely obliterating the idea that she was ever perfectly normal because she was always meant to be this, but she’s considered better because she yells at the Doctor and doesn’t wear tight skirts.   

This. I love Donna but fucking come on.

Also the OP just described Clara

well shit, they did as well

so they want the next companion to be the same as clara, seems legit :P

And I’d also like them to point out when exactly the Doctor has ever sexualized a companion of willingly kissed one besides his wife.

Cause the sexualizing is at pretty much none and kissing is at a grand total of one. Which just so happens to be Rory.

In terms of sexualisation, the line about being squeezed into a too-tight skirt from “Nightmare in Silver”? Maybe? (Which is treated by the narrative as wrong and the Doctor shocks himself by saying it, but when have facts ever stopped Tumblr?) Or the awkwardness of being Clara’s fictional boyfriend? But that’s still not a regular occurrence with Clara, never mind the 2005 era companions as a whole. I can only really think of those two. (So still at “pretty much none”)

He also willingly kissed Rose while she was the Bad Wolf and kissed Martha (while calling it “nothing”) as part of a plan to stop the vampire at Martha’s hospital, and I don’t think he was dumbfounded or resisting when Jack kissed him, so I think that counts as “willing”.

I’ll rephrase that. A willing kiss that the Doctor initiates that is nothing more than a sexual/romantic/platonic kiss that is not used a part of a plan or to save someone. Which cuts that down to four. Two of which are with River. With the other two being platonic. 

And you’ve pretty much summed up all the so call sexualization the Doctor does of his companions in the show’s entire run, none-the-less Moffat’s run, whom these people are more likely referring to. So that’s one line of vaguely sexual thought and an awkward pretend relationship where he was naked the entire time, which only served to make things more awkward. The horrible fiend.  

I know right? That’s such definitely concrete, damning not-tenuous evidence right there…!

I love this post, I really do but Donna died in “Turn Left” after she had to cause a car accident in order for things to go back to normal….

What does that have to do with anything? That literally has nothing to do with the current conversation.

thefrozenhurricane:

theconfessionsofawhovian:

http://theconfessionsofawhovian.tumblr.com/

how much do you want to bet this is just based on them having red hair?

because it really makes no sense

next up, danny is mickey’s cousin!

I once came across a fic where Rory was related to Rhys Williams from Torchwood. One guess why they chose that. I bet Martha and Ianto are related to, cause Jones is totally not a common name.

24 minutes ago with 14 notes
via: thefrozenhurricane source: theconfessionsofawhovian

lovelynobody00:

moriarty:

how come no one ever talks about how hans was about to slice elsa’s fucking head off

image

its like every character in the movie was g-rated disney, except for hans, hans literally came straight out of game of thrones

the southern isles send their regards

35 minutes ago with 287,512 notes
via: thefrozenhurricane source: moriarty
Anonymous: River/Doctor: The Doctor can always tell when River is in her timeline based on how she touches him

queenriver:

River at her youngest grabs him with claws, kisses him with teeth, and when they fall into bed after a long day of running she’s like a hurricane — directionless and destructive, after nights with his early-days wife, he’s covered in blotches of red and tiny-smug teeth marks, fingernail scratches along his back and bruises around his hips. She makes him into wreckage, when she’s not quite River Song yet, and he shouldn’t like it, but he kind of does, a bit.

Read More

39 minutes ago with 65 notes
via: queenriver source: queenriver

actualucifer:

astolat:

liminalzone:

notwithoutmycoffee:

Anyone notice that Tony has plans to build each Avenger their own floor at Stark Tower? He picks Captain America’s first.

I HAD NO IDEA THAT WAS WHAT HE WAS DOING. I THOUGHT HE WAS JUST REBUILDING. NOT PLOTTING EVERYONE’S APARTMENTS~ IN HIS TOWER. OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD.

okay this is AWESOME, who is going to write the Tony Stark Interior Designer AU please

"I’m thinking a theme of muted sepia and cream, with dark blue notes — relaxing, yet masculine," Tony said. "What do you think?"

"Uh," Steve said. "Can I have a firm mattress?"

"Four-thousand springs Duxiana, buddy, nothing but the best for my team," Tony said. 

"…is that a yes or a no?" Steve said. 

"Okay, okay, buddy, I think you’re going a little overboard with the red. I think we can tone down the silver, too. What about, like, a nice pale gold? With like, shades of dark brown-green? Or is that too Loki…"
"Uh, Stark-"
"C’mon, Thor, gimme something to work with here. What kind of stand do you need for the hammer?"

"So I’m thinking lots of green and purple-"
Tony-“
"I’m kidding! What about pale blue? You know, those weird unnatural eggshell things. That’s a nice, calming colour. And like, a bit of pale yellow, too."
"I thought you wanted me to "embrace the beast" or whatever-"
"Not in my tower. Do not wreck my tower."

"So did you guys want like a double room, or-"
"Stark-"
I will rip your face off-“
"Alright, Blackhawk! Chill! I’m still thinking joined - hey! That record player actually cost stuff, you know?! You can’t just be tossing - and there’s my fridge. That’s heavy, you know. My mini-fridge is heavy - stop it!"

40 minutes ago with 22,719 notes
via: endlesslywholocked source: notwithoutmycoffee

iTunes is not letting me listen to the newest Night Vale.

53 minutes ago with 1 note

tambokazooie:

theenigmaofriversong:

tambokazooie:

theenigmaofriversong:

thefrozenhurricane:

doogiestinson:

thefrozenhurricane:

theenigmaofriversong:

alextimmons:

poco-loki:

thecorruptedquietone:

prongsmydeer:

Plot twist: The next companion is a normal girl/boy who only dies once in their lifetime and has no remarkable back story but he thinks they’re wonderful because they are human and the Doctor needs reminding that you don’t need to be a mystery to be remarkable. 

#and the doctor never has to kiss them or sexualize them at all #in fact they are not even attracted to the doctor

so basically we want Donna back

image

So basically we want someone who penultimate moment proves that she was destined to be in the role she is in, completely obliterating the idea that she was ever perfectly normal because she was always meant to be this, but she’s considered better because she yells at the Doctor and doesn’t wear tight skirts.   

This. I love Donna but fucking come on.

Also the OP just described Clara

well shit, they did as well

so they want the next companion to be the same as clara, seems legit :P

And I’d also like them to point out when exactly the Doctor has ever sexualized a companion of willingly kissed one besides his wife.

Cause the sexualizing is at pretty much none and kissing is at a grand total of one. Which just so happens to be Rory.

In terms of sexualisation, the line about being squeezed into a too-tight skirt from “Nightmare in Silver”? Maybe? (Which is treated by the narrative as wrong and the Doctor shocks himself by saying it, but when have facts ever stopped Tumblr?) Or the awkwardness of being Clara’s fictional boyfriend? But that’s still not a regular occurrence with Clara, never mind the 2005 era companions as a whole. I can only really think of those two. (So still at “pretty much none”)

He also willingly kissed Rose while she was the Bad Wolf and kissed Martha (while calling it “nothing”) as part of a plan to stop the vampire at Martha’s hospital, and I don’t think he was dumbfounded or resisting when Jack kissed him, so I think that counts as “willing”.

I’ll rephrase that. A willing kiss that the Doctor initiates that is nothing more than a sexual/romantic/platonic kiss that is not used a part of a plan or to save someone. Which cuts that down to four. Two of which are with River. With the other two being platonic. 

And you’ve pretty much summed up all the so call sexualization the Doctor does of his companions in the show’s entire run, none-the-less Moffat’s run, whom these people are more likely referring to. So that’s one line of vaguely sexual thought and an awkward pretend relationship where he was naked the entire time, which only served to make things more awkward. The horrible fiend.  

I know right? That’s such definitely concrete, damning not-tenuous evidence right there…!

56 minutes ago with 171,017 notes
via: tambokazooie source: prongsmydeer

littleyaoithings:

Yes I support gay rights.

Yes I would care if you died.

No I’m not going to reblog that post.

(Source: yiffmebabyonemoretime)

shit-nipple: Hey I just wanted to ask you something, and I just want to say this right off, I am in no way trying to be offensive. Why do you get upset when you see moffat hate? Because, in my opinion, he's not the best dude. In his writing the women are seen just as love interests not as actual people, he has plot wholes left and right big enough to drive a truck through, and in general his stories arent great. (im hopeing you can make me see him in a different light perhaps ^u^)

clarabosswald:

holla friend!!!! thanks for asking so nicely!
i get upset when i see moffat hate because, very often, it’s more of a hate trend than actual, well thought of and well written criticism. because i’ve seen so many people call him horrible things and get so mean and personal like he’s not even a real person. because one time i’ve actually seen someone tag a moffat hate post as “moffat hate ftw xD” and it makes me sick to the stomache. 
now i’m gonna divide my response to 3 parts:

  • moffat’s women: i strongly disagree with your claim about them. i don’t think that what moffat does in his writing - i think that’s just how people choose to see his characters; by degrading them into a few motifs or characteristics, while in reality they are so much more complex and interesting than that. nancy’s story wasn’t about romance but about her struggles with the children she took care of, and the horrible truth about her “little brother”, and her bravery; reinette had a gig with the doctor, yes, but it wasn’t what her story was about, and it doesn’t make her character weak at all - she was noble, wise beyond her years, decisive, graceful - she dealt with the happenings in her life with incredible grace; sally’s story contained romance, with billy and eventually larry, but it wasn’t the focus either - it was about her getting thrown into the dangerous life of the doctor almost unwillingly, dealing with the weeping angels and losing her friends on herself, with just a video message from a strange man to trust - she was brave and intelligent and took no shit, determined to have control in her life but not patronizing; and i’m not gonna start talking about river and amy and clara becasue they’re main characters and it’ll take me ages to explain how i see them. my point is, making moffat’s women into mere love interests is fan concept: in reality, his women are real people, with their own lives and decisions, much more complicated and layered than how fans make them seem. 
  • plot holes: personally i found that many of his “plot holes” are perfectly explainable. his plots are like puzzles - you need to get the right pieces and put them together in the right order to see how it makes sense. but it DOES make sense. moffat also doesn’t ignore it when people don’t understand his plots and explains them in interviews (like the amy and rory in new york issue). also, he does occasionally have holes in his plots, and he often acknowledges it. he’s not perfect - every writer has their faults. it’s impossible to keep such complex plotlines as moffat’s spotless. expecting him to do that is a bit too much in my opinion. also, i actually like it when he doesn’t explain everything - it leaves place to speculations and your own imagination which, to be honest, can be much more powerful than “official fixed explained plot facts” or whatever. it happens a lot in who - that’s the fun.
  • his general stories: saying they’re not great is a very general, and very subjective, thing to say, and it’s perfectly fine. you don’t like his stories - i do - it doesn’t mean we can’t coexist in the fandom. but when people take their opinions to horrible extremes - that’s where i put the line, and that’s what i talk about when i get upset over moffat hate, not casual opinions like yours or anybody’s, which are absolutely valid and which i totally respect.

basically, like i said, i could go on forever - this is where asking about specifics helps, and even then, i could still go on forever - which just comes to show how much this whole thing has to do with personal interpretations and views. it’s huge fun discussing it and seeing other people’s points of view. it’s much less fun when it gets personal and offensive. it depends HUGELY on what sort of blogs you surround yourself with (when it comes to tumblr), which views do they offer, their sources (super important!!!!!!! sources can often be twisted and biased; written interviews often get interpreted in certain ways, while they can have a lot of meanings; and, most of all - when it comes to moffat, he’s not being serious about what he says like, 90% of the time. he being cynical and humorous A LOT and people take what he says seriously way too often. the best you can do, in my opinion, is draw your conclusions from video interviews). 
look, i don’t think he’s perfect; there’s lines of his that i don’t like, and episodes which could’ve been better, just like rtd or any other writer on any other show. but demonizing him like so many of the fans do it just wrong. he’s a human being.

1 hour ago with 18 notes
via: clarabosswald source: clarabosswald

I’m not a fool, sweetie. I know what happens if we touch.

(Source: sherlockwilliamholmes)

1 hour ago with 6,260 notes
via: cmartlover source: sherlockwilliamholmes

heyytalia:

Seeing a post that you know has completely false and extremely misleading information, but it has so many notes that you just

image

1 hour ago with 10,481 notes
via: featherywingss source: heyytalia

tambokazooie:

theenigmaofriversong:

thefrozenhurricane:

doogiestinson:

thefrozenhurricane:

theenigmaofriversong:

alextimmons:

poco-loki:

thecorruptedquietone:

prongsmydeer:

Plot twist: The next companion is a normal girl/boy who only dies once in their lifetime and has no remarkable back story but he thinks they’re wonderful because they are human and the Doctor needs reminding that you don’t need to be a mystery to be remarkable. 

#and the doctor never has to kiss them or sexualize them at all #in fact they are not even attracted to the doctor

so basically we want Donna back

image

So basically we want someone who penultimate moment proves that she was destined to be in the role she is in, completely obliterating the idea that she was ever perfectly normal because she was always meant to be this, but she’s considered better because she yells at the Doctor and doesn’t wear tight skirts.   

This. I love Donna but fucking come on.

Also the OP just described Clara

well shit, they did as well

so they want the next companion to be the same as clara, seems legit :P

And I’d also like them to point out when exactly the Doctor has ever sexualized a companion of willingly kissed one besides his wife.

Cause the sexualizing is at pretty much none and kissing is at a grand total of one. Which just so happens to be Rory.

In terms of sexualisation, the line about being squeezed into a too-tight skirt from “Nightmare in Silver”? Maybe? (Which is treated by the narrative as wrong and the Doctor shocks himself by saying it, but when have facts ever stopped Tumblr?) Or the awkwardness of being Clara’s fictional boyfriend? But that’s still not a regular occurrence with Clara, never mind the 2005 era companions as a whole. I can only really think of those two. (So still at “pretty much none”)

He also willingly kissed Rose while she was the Bad Wolf and kissed Martha (while calling it “nothing”) as part of a plan to stop the vampire at Martha’s hospital, and I don’t think he was dumbfounded or resisting when Jack kissed him, so I think that counts as “willing”.

I’ll rephrase that. A willing kiss that the Doctor initiates that is nothing more than a sexual/romantic/platonic kiss that is not used a part of a plan or to save someone. Which cuts that down to four. Two of which are with River. With the other two being platonic. 

And you’ve pretty much summed up all the so call sexualization the Doctor does of his companions in the show’s entire run, none-the-less Moffat’s run, whom these people are more likely referring to. So that’s one line of vaguely sexual thought and an awkward pretend relationship where he was naked the entire time, which only served to make things more awkward. The horrible fiend.  

1 hour ago with 171,017 notes
via: tambokazooie source: prongsmydeer

thefrozenhurricane:

doogiestinson:

thefrozenhurricane:

theenigmaofriversong:

alextimmons:

poco-loki:

thecorruptedquietone:

prongsmydeer:

Plot twist: The next companion is a normal girl/boy who only dies once in their lifetime and has no remarkable back story but he thinks they’re wonderful because they are human and the Doctor needs reminding that you don’t need to be a mystery to be remarkable. 

#and the doctor never has to kiss them or sexualize them at all #in fact they are not even attracted to the doctor

so basically we want Donna back

image

So basically we want someone who penultimate moment proves that she was destined to be in the role she is in, completely obliterating the idea that she was ever perfectly normal because she was always meant to be this, but she’s considered better because she yells at the Doctor and doesn’t wear tight skirts.   

This. I love Donna but fucking come on.

Also the OP just described Clara

well shit, they did as well

so they want the next companion to be the same as clara, seems legit :P

And I’d also like them to point out when exactly the Doctor has ever sexualized a companion of willingly kissed one besides his wife.

Cause the sexualizing is at pretty much none and kissing is at a grand total of one. Which just so happens to be Rory.

2 hours ago with 171,017 notes
via: thefrozenhurricane source: prongsmydeer
People who don't wear glasses: I wish I wore glasses.
People who wear glasses: No.

(Source: thepcapaldi)

2 hours ago with 262 notes
via: canyousonicme source: thepcapaldi